« UCLA's Defense Puts Away Biola in Exhibition Match-up | Main | BBR: UCLA Bruins 2008-09 Basketball Preview »

Monday, November 10, 2008

Comments

Bummer about Snaer. Thanks for the update BBR.

If JH bails after 1 season: for 2009-2010 our back court will be JA & ML. Hopefully for 2010-2011 as well. We'll be just fine without Gaddy or Snaer! They ain't any better than ML or JA. Farmar and Afflalo were ranked about the same as Lee and Anderson. Need I say more?

Hey what about Withey? Any chance we can snag him? I know he had interest in the Bruins at one time and Howland was interested in his length, and I believe even made an offer. He's a true center (7'0"), something we haven't had since the departure of Hollins.

Once Aboya moves on, imagine Withey and Bobo sharing time, or even playing together! Keefe will be a senior next year and is more of a PF, so we really will be relying only on Morgan and Stover in the middle. Withey would be a nice compliment to the two.

What do you think fellow Bruins?

[Deleted]

Please don't post entire articles. Post link to article instead.

The success that BH has had with non-five-star talent is well documented, RW, LRMAM, LMR, etc. However, I cannot help but think that the coaches and fans would prefer to have 5 star talent were the five star talent to desire to attend UCLA. Everyone touted KLove's national ranking and the additional publicity that it brought to the program. BH can make great talent even better, which is what is going to be needed to not just get to the Dance but win it against the top athletic talent like that which ended up at Florida or Memphis. Of course, that is definitely an all-things-being-equal comment, which they are not. So I would say that it is a bummer that we are not going to have another five-star-heavy recruiting class like the 2008 recruiting class (unless a rabbit appears from the proverbial hat). I just hope that the 2008 recruits, especially JH and JM, stay for more than one year.

I'll still take ML and JA any day. You can't expect to pull 5 star classes every year. It scares recruits who want PT away (eg. Snaer and Gaddy)

Other than the top player of each spot, there usually isnt a real difference between 2 through 5 or 6 players.

While 5 star players overall are nice to have regardless, you need players who arent attention heavy and are willing to do what it takes to help the team win.

IMO it is good to have 2-3 5 stars at a any given time and the rest role players. I dont mean 2-3 5 star recruits at a time, but I really think you need 2-3 5 star guys to have a real good shot at winning it all on your roster.

Now this does not mean a 4 star player wont ever get better and become a 5 star quality. Rather you just need 2-3 5 star quality players on your roster be it they came in with that quality, or develope into it. The best scenereo imo is that have 4 star guys that develop into 5 star quality since they stay multiple years and tend to end up knowing the system better.

In any case, BH will no doubt keep the good recruits coming in. We just need a few good players to last multiple years to do it.

If Gordon can develope to a smaller Marcus Camby player and Morgan like a Bynum type of guy, we are in a real good shape.

Ucla does not need these players to score bunches but rather be a presence inside and be able to be a sort of threat offensively and defensively.

Importantly is to get a solid 3 that can do multiple things. This is a position that has been a weak spot in last couple of years which I hope Shipp gets back to form.

I thinhk you need to have 1-2 all american level players on a team in order to win it all.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment



Site Information

  • Bruin Basketball Report is an independent site and is not affiliated with the UCLA Athletic Department.

    Copyright © 2005-09
    Bruin Basketball Report.
    All rights reserved.